{"id":1327,"date":"2026-05-11T08:32:26","date_gmt":"2026-05-11T12:32:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jakony.com\/frontpage\/?p=1327"},"modified":"2026-05-11T08:32:26","modified_gmt":"2026-05-11T12:32:26","slug":"rostov-on-don-attack-satellite-evidence-points-to-powerful-ukrainian-missile","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jakony.com\/frontpage\/europe\/rostov-on-don-attack-satellite-evidence-points-to-powerful-ukrainian-missile\/","title":{"rendered":"Rostov-on-Don Attack: Satellite Evidence Points to Powerful Ukrainian Missile"},"content":{"rendered":"

(ROSTOV-ON-DON, RUSSIA) \u2013 Satellite imagery has revealed extensive damage to a Russian military supply factory in Rostov-on-Don following a possible ballistic missile strike, amid speculation that Ukraine may have deployed a new weapons system.<\/span><\/p>\n

The site, operated by a company called RADAR which manufactures components for the Russian army, sustained severe destruction across multiple buildings. Three warehouse or factory structures were completely destroyed, one was partially demolished, and two further buildings exhibited holes in their roofs consistent with drone strikes.<\/span><\/p>\n

Online speculation has centred on whether Ukraine employed the new FP-7 ballistic missile in the attack. Ukraine has neither confirmed nor denied the use of the FP-7 system. Analysts from Suchomimus noted that the FP-7 is believed to be based on the S-300 missile, which Russia itself has utilised in a ground-to-ground role. <\/span><\/p>\n

Ukraine appears to have modified the concept, incorporating the guidance components and adapting it for ground-to-ground operations. If the FP-7 was indeed responsible, the strike would represent a significant demonstration of accuracy, substantial destructive power, and a complete failure of Russian air defences to intercept the incoming munitions.<\/span><\/p>\n

Alternative assessments suggest the damage could have been caused by more established Ukrainian missile systems. The scale of destruction is considered too severe for drone strikes, which typically lack the necessary penetration and payload. <\/span><\/p>\n

The Storm Shadow cruise missile remains a possibility, though the extent of the damage appears greater than what a Storm Shadow would normally inflict unless it penetrated the structure and detonated a secondary explosive. The Neptune missile is viewed as the most probable candidate, presenting a more plausible explanation than a rare salvo of four accurate hits by the less precise Flamingo system.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Russian government has claimed that only debris landed on Rostov-on-Don. This assertion has been met with scepticism, as the observed devastation would require debris of extraordinary scale.<\/span><\/p>\n

The RADAR factory supplies unspecified components to the Russian military. The precise nature of its output remains vague, with possibilities including electronic warfare devices or radar components, potentially linked to the several air bases and an aircraft repair shop located in the Rostov region.<\/span><\/p>\n

Footage and analysis of the satellite imagery were released by the Suchomimus channel.<\/span><\/p>\n