{"id":1339,"date":"2026-05-12T12:22:11","date_gmt":"2026-05-12T16:22:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jakony.com\/frontpage\/?p=1339"},"modified":"2026-05-12T12:22:11","modified_gmt":"2026-05-12T16:22:11","slug":"april-reversal-russia-loses-113-square-kilometres-to-ukraine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jakony.com\/frontpage\/video\/april-reversal-russia-loses-113-square-kilometres-to-ukraine\/","title":{"rendered":"April Reversal: Russia Loses 113 Square Kilometres to Ukraine"},"content":{"rendered":"

(KYIV) <\/span><\/strong>–<\/span>\u00a0The strategic initiative in the war in Ukraine has shifted towards Ukrainian forces for the first time in nearly three years, according to an analysis by The Economist. The report details a series of compounding Russian failures throughout 2026, which have exposed systemic weaknesses and been exploited by Kyiv.<\/span><\/p>\n

A key indicator of this shift is the failure of Russia\u2019s much-anticipated spring offensive. The operation not only stalled but reversed, with Russian forces suffering a net territorial loss of 113 square kilometres in April. This marks the first monthly net loss of Ukrainian territory by Russia since August 2024.<\/span><\/p>\n

The analysis highlights the profound psychological and strategic impact of Ukraine\u2019s expanding long-range strike capability. Ukrainian drones and missiles now routinely strike targets deep inside the Russian Federation, reaching up to 2,000 kilometres, including the city of Yekaterinburg beyond the Ural Mountains. These regions, long considered geographically safe from foreign attack even during the Second World War, are no longer secure. The strikes have triggered significant public disquiet across Russia, exposing the myth of the country\u2019s vast territory as an impenetrable strategic barrier.<\/span><\/p>\n

This deep strike campaign has enabled Ukraine to systematically demilitarise Russian military infrastructure, destroying oil refineries, ammunition depots, and airbases housing fighter jets far from the front lines. The Economist notes that these capabilities were developed domestically after Ukraine was initially prohibited by its partners from using long-range weapons against military targets inside Russia.<\/span><\/p>\n

Simultaneously, Russian manpower deficits are becoming critical. Monthly conscription drives are failing to replenish mounting casualty numbers. Compounding this, a blockade of the Telegram messaging app, a central communication tool for Russian military units, severely disrupted their coordination. The loss of this network, for which no adequate substitute could be found, contributed to significant battlefield setbacks. The illegal use of the Starlink satellite internet system by Russian forces was also reportedly disrupted, following interventions by the Ukrainian Defence Minister.<\/span><\/p>\n

The economic strain on the Russian state is intensifying. The combined pressures of the war, strained federal and regional budgets, and a lack of funds to provide promised payments to soldiers and entice new conscripts are generating instability. Reports indicate growing public anger, with citizens rushing to withdraw cash from banks amid fears of a collapse of the Russian banking system.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Economist report also notes a growing fissure within the Russian elite. Vloggers, opinion leaders, and even deputies are increasingly voicing criticism of the Russian dictator, not out of concern for Ukrainian victims, but because they sense a regime weakened by failure. This internal shift is amplified by visible security failures, such as drone strikes causing mass flight cancellations in Moscow, which forced the Russian dictator to request that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy permit a public Victory Day parade.<\/span><\/p>\n

These compounding failures follow a winter campaign in which Russia launched a brutal assault on Ukraine\u2019s energy infrastructure. The resilience of the Ukrainian population during this period, according to the report, did not lead to calls for capitulation but rather fuelled a wave of innovation and domestic weapons production that is now yielding results on the battlefield.<\/span><\/p>\n