(JUBA) – A dispute has emerged between the Presidency and the main power provider in the capital after the Ezra Group of Companies rejected an order by President Salva Kiir to reduce electricity tariffs.
The President directed tariff cuts last week to ease pressure on households and businesses. Under the directive, the cost per unit for users consuming less than 100 kilowatt hours was to drop from 0.303 US dollars to 0.273 US dollars. For consumption above 100 kilowatt hours, the rate was to fall from 0.316 US dollars to 0.285 US dollars. Monthly service charges were also cancelled.
At the current exchange rate of 7,100 South Sudan Pounds to the dollar, the revised tariffs would be:
| Consumption | Previous Tariff (USD) | New Tariff (USD) | Previous Tariff (SSP) | New Tariff (SSP) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 100 kWh | $0.303 | $0.273 | 2,151 SSP | 1,938 SSP |
| Above 100 kWh | $0.316 | $0.285 | 2,244 SSP | 2,024 SSP |
However, Ezra, the majority shareholder in Juba Electricity Distribution Company, has refused to implement the changes. The company said the directive lacks clarity and instructed JEDCO to continue billing under current contract terms. Ezra has written to the Ministry of Energy and the South Sudan Electricity Corporation and asked for talks before changes are made.
The company argues that any alteration must consider investor commitments and sustainability in the sector. Critics say the refusal challenges the authority of the Presidency and denies citizens expected relief.
Civil society groups have condemned the response. Edmund Yakani, the head of CEPO, said electricity costs are already too high and block small businesses and poorer households. He questioned why a company would override a direct order issued on the basis of public interest.
Economist Abraham Maliet said Ezra should explain its position to the public. He noted that the President’s order followed recommendations from a technical committee. He also pointed to concerns over the funding and agreements made with foreign partners during the development of the electricity system.
Maliet said households face extra charges, including a three dollar monthly fee, equal to about 21,300 South Sudan Pounds, and are required to buy their own basic equipment before accessing electricity. He said companies should comply with government policy first and then raise any concerns through proper channels.
The standoff has again raised questions over regulation, private investment in essential services and the role of foreign stakeholders in South Sudan’s energy sector. Observers warn that unless the dispute is resolved soon, it may further damage confidence in service delivery and investment planning.
Consumers in Juba remain unsure whether the lower tariffs will be enforced or whether the current rates will stay in place. The Presidency has yet to announce its next step.