Former NATO Commander Declares US Under Trump A Bully And No Longer An Ally

(LONDON) – The United States under the current Trump administration can no longer be considered a reliable ally and is actively undermining the NATO alliance, according to General Sir Richard Shirreff. The former Deputy Supreme Allied Commander of NATO delivered a scathing assessment of American foreign policy during an interview with Cathy Newman on Times Radio Drive, characterising recent actions from Washington as predatory and vindictive.

The remarks follow recent updates from the United States Secretary of War Pete Hegseth regarding operations in the Middle East. Hegseth announced that the administration has authorised the United States Navy to destroy any Iranian fastboats attempting to lay mines or disrupt commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. Hegseth explicitly stated that commanders have clear rules of engagement to shoot and kill in order to destroy threats.

Furthermore, Hegseth issued a sharp critique of European allies, demanding they cease holding conferences and instead deploy maritime assets to support American operations. Complicating the transatlantic relationship further is a leaked Pentagon memorandum that outlines potential punitive measures against European nations. The document notably includes a proposed shift in the United States position regarding British sovereignty over the Falkland Islands.

General Shirreff did not mince words when addressing these developments, describing the statements from Hegseth as deranged nutter comments and categorising the Pentagon memorandum as vindictive and predatory bullying. The former military commander asserted that the constant escalation of rhetoric signals a strategic reality that Europe must accept.

He stated unequivocally that the United States is no longer underpinning NATO in any shape or form, citing threats to attack Greenland and the Falkland Islands, as well as the hurling of insults at European nations for declining to join American operations in the Middle East. General Shirreff maintained a highly sceptical tone regarding the relationship between the United States administration and the Russian dictator.

He warned that the current American leadership is subservient to the commands of the Russian dictator and is actively attempting to force a peace agreement upon Ukraine that would amount to total capitulation. He argued that until the United States leadership commits completely to the Article Five collective defence provision, American firepower cannot be relied upon by Europe.

Addressing the future of NATO, General Shirreff sharply criticised the approach of Secretary General Mark Rutte. He dismissed current diplomatic efforts as appeasement, stating that Rutte is effectively crawling on his belly to the United States leadership to no avail. Instead, General Shirreff urged NATO to unequivocally commit to a Europeanised alliance. He noted that while nations such as Germany, Poland, Finland, Sweden and the Baltic states are increasing their financial commitments, the United Kingdom is failing to keep pace.

Having recently returned from Ukraine, General Shirreff contrasted the existential fight for European security in Kyiv with what he described as drifting and a fundamental failure of leadership in the United Kingdom. He highlighted the tragic irony of the current Labour government commissioning a strategic defence review that correctly identified the necessary adaptations for modern warfare, only to leave it unfunded and ignored.

Echoing recent comments from Lord Robertson regarding toxic complacency, General Shirreff stated that the United Kingdom lacks the leadership required to implement the review. He called for immediate action to fund the military and urged the Prime Minister to communicate straight to the British public about the sacrifices needed to secure the nation.

The general received significant support from listeners, with messages describing his analysis as absolute truth telling and suggesting he is the type of leader required in Downing Street. When pressed by Newman on whether he would be concerned about defence spending under potential alternative Labour leaders if the Prime Minister were replaced, such as Angela Rayner, Ed Miliband or John Healey, General Shirreff refused to be drawn into discussing specific personalities. However, he remained optimistic, noting that historical crises often produce leaders with the necessary moral courage and determination to make tough decisions.