(ABU DHABI, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES) – The United States is reportedly pressuring Ukraine to accept a peace agreement by March and hold national elections in May. A negotiating team led by Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner has urged Kyiv to expedite the process, cautioning that the political capital of Donald Trump may diminish as the US congressional midterm elections approach in November.
The US proposals envision a resolution to the conflict before the summer, setting a timeline for a signed peace treaty in March followed by elections two months later. However, analysts suggest such a schedule remains improbable as the Russian dictator has shown no genuine inclination to end hostilities. Yielding defensive positions in the Donbas region is widely viewed as a strategic risk for Ukraine, particularly as the Kremlin continues to demand significant territorial concessions in exchange for a ceasefire.
Scepticism remains high regarding the durability of any such agreement. Concerns persist that the Russian dictator may utilise a temporary cessation of hostilities to wait out the US midterm elections before resuming military operations. This potential for manipulation highlights the vulnerability of the current US administration to Kremlin tactics.
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy recently disclosed that Ukrainian intelligence has uncovered details of a 12 trillion US dollar (£9.2 trillion) economic cooperation proposal between Russia and the US. The package, reportedly presented by Kremlin negotiator Kirill Dmitriev during recent contact with Washington, potentially contains clauses that would compromise Ukrainian sovereignty.
Financial experts, including Sir William Browder, have dismissed the feasibility of the 12 trillion US dollar (£9.2 trillion) figure. Given that the Russian economy is valued at approximately 2.5 trillion US dollars (£1.9 trillion), a proposal of such magnitude is mathematically impossible, representing nearly five times the annual gross domestic product of Russia. Critics argue these figures are fabricated to appeal to Donald Trump, who is known for his affinity for high value deal making despite the lack of economic reality.
Human rights advocate Garry Kasparov has further criticised the negotiations, suggesting the only real pact involves the personal financial interests of those involved. Critics suggest that Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner are focused on initiatives that benefit the Trump family interests, while any agreement involving the Kremlin serves primarily to enrich the Russian dictator. In this context, Ukraine is viewed by some observers not as a sovereign partner, but as a secondary concern in a broader effort to secure private financial gain.
Full update video here:
Russian Forces Totally Stopped After Starlink Loss
